in

Baltimore's Persistent Aerial Surveillance Ruled Unconstitutional

cato-daily-01
To listen to this podcast episode, click on the Play button in the bar at the bottom of the screen. To listen while browsing, click on the Expand button at the bottom right to launch the player in a new browser tab/window.

Persistent aerial surveillance may make the jobs of cops easier, but it’s no solution if it endangers your rights. Matthew Feeney discusses the case of Balitmore’s aerial surveillance program.


See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

economist-radio-01

Editor’s Picks: July 5th 2021

conservative-enclave-01

Ep. 516 | It's about Ukraine