Brnovich v. DNC, The Supreme Court, and Voting Rights

To listen to this podcast episode, click on the Play button in the bar at the bottom of the screen. To listen while browsing, click on the Expand button at the bottom right to launch the player in a new browser tab/window.

Last week, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee—upholding two Arizona voting rules by deciding that they did not violate the Voting Rights Act or the Constitution and were not enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose. On this week’s episode, scholars debate whether that ruling was correct and how it might impact the future of voting rights and how elections are conducted in America. Host Jeffrey Rosen was joined by Rick Hasen, professor of law at the University of California Irvine, and Ilya Shapiro, a vice president at the Cato Institute.

For more insight on this case from our guests, check out Rick Hasen’s recent pieces for Slate ( and The New York Times ( and Ilya Shapiro’s recent pieces for The Washington Examiner ( and SCOTUSblog (

Additional resources and transcript available at

Questions or comments about the show? Email us at [email protected]


Charlie Launches Massive 'No Forced Vax' Campus Campaign and Liberal Minds Explode


Teachers Unions Side with the Far-Left on Critical Race Theory